MASV vs Sinosend: File Transfer for Video Production and B2B
Compare MASV's video-focused platform with Sinosend's comprehensive B2B file transfer solution
MASV is tailored for video production professionals. Sinosend also handles large video files beautifully while providing superior B2B file transfer and request capabilities. See which is right for your team.
M
Quick Comparison
| Feature | MASV | Sinosend |
|---|---|---|
| Max File Transfer Size | 500GB per transfer | 100GB standard, unlimited with enterprise |
| Primary Use Case | Video production and media workflows | B2B transfers + video + all file types |
| Video File Optimization | ✓ | ✓ |
| File Requests (Non-Video) | Limited support | ✓ |
| Resume Failed Transfers | ✓ | ✓ |
| Password Protection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Watermarking Support | ✓ | Available on enterprise |
| File Preview (Video) | ✓ | ✓ |
| B2B Integration Ready | Limited | ✓ |
| Custom Domain | Pro plan and above | ✓ |
| White Label Portals | Premium plans | ✓ |
| Data Residency Control | US/EU only | 6+ regions including Asia-Pacific |
| Update Files After Send | ✗ | ✓ |
| Real-time Download Tracking | Basic (video-focused) | Advanced (geo-location, device, IP) |
| Global Data Centers | US, EU | US, EU, Asia, UK, Mexico, Middle East |
| Team Collaboration | Video team focused | Cross-functional teams |
| API Available | Limited | Full REST API |
| Per-File vs Per-Month Pricing | Pay-per-file ($0.25/GB) | Monthly plans (better for frequent transfers) |
| Storage Integration | Direct (S3, GCS) | Via Requests feature |
| AI Auto-Tagging | Limited | ✓ |
Detailed Comparison
MASV
✓ Strengths
- Excellent for video production workflows
- Large file size support (500GB)
- Built-in video preview and review tools
- Resume capability for interrupted transfers
- Watermarking available for sensitive content
- Direct integration with video storage platforms
- Good for creative professionals
✗ Limitations
- Expensive per-file pricing model ($0.25/GB adds up quickly)
- Limited B2B file request capabilities
- Not ideal for business document transfers
- Only 2 data center regions
- Cannot update files after sending
- Minimal tracking for non-video use cases
- Overkill for general business file sharing
- Limited team collaboration for non-creative teams
- Steep learning curve for basic file transfers
Sinosend
✓ Strengths
- Handles video files excellently while supporting all file types
- Affordable monthly pricing (vs MASV's per-file model)
- Powerful B2B file requests with validation
- 6+ global data centers with full residency control
- Real-time analytics for all file types
- Update files after sending - perfect for production revisions
- White-label solutions for agencies
- Works seamlessly for both video and non-video workflows
- Advanced team collaboration features
- Full REST API for custom integrations
- Better for mixed workflows (marketing, sales, engineering)
⚠ Considerations
- Not video-production focused
- Doesn't have watermarking in free tier
- Newer brand in the video production space
- Standard max 100GB (vs MASV's 500GB)
Choose Sinosend if you:
- Handles Everything, Not Just Video
- Better Pricing for Frequent Users
- Asia-Pacific Operations
Choose MASV if you:
- Business File Requests
- Update Production Files
What Users Say About Switching to Sinosend
★★★★★
"We use MASV for big video transfers but Sinosend for everything else. Sinosend is so much cheaper and actually works better for our file requests from clients."
★★★★★
"MASV was $2,000/month for our video team. Switched to Sinosend for mixed video and doc transfers. Same quality, $400/month. Huge savings."
★★★★★
"Loved MASV for video but needed B2B file requests. Sinosend does both beautifully and the geo-tracking is excellent for our global clients."